NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: GC v R [2019] NSWCCA 241 Hearing dates: 10 April 2019 Decision date: 18 October 2019 Before: Payne JA; Wilson J; Ierace J Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted.
(2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against sentence – Whether the sentencing judge erred in the application of the principle of totality – where the applicant had been sentenced for similar offences previously Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 6(3), 12 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A, 25AA, 25A, 33 Sentencing Act 1989 (NSW) Cases Cited: Abdulrahman v R [2016] NSWCCA 192 DL v R (2018) 358 ALR 666; [2018] HCA 32 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59; [1988] HCA 70 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 Category: Principal judgment Parties: GC (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Segal (Applicant) K Ratcliffe (Respondent)
Solicitors: Criminal and Traffic Law (Applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2015/194013 Publication restriction: Non-publication order made on 27 October 2017 in respect of the identities of the complainants, extending to include the name of the applicant Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 15 December 2017 Before: North DCJ File Number(s): 2015/194013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate