NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Kennedy [2019] NSWCCA 242 Hearing dates: 27 September 2019 Date of orders: 18 October 2019 Decision date: 18 October 2019 Before: Payne JA and Fullerton J at [1]; Adamson J at [100] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed; (2) Set aside the sentence imposed by Grant DCJ on 7 June 2019 and in its place: (a) impose an aggregate sentence of imprisonment of 4 years; (b) under s 19AB(2) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) impose a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months; (c) the sentence and non-parole period to date from 18 October 2019. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – manifest inadequacy – whether 3 years imprisonment served by way of intensive correction order was manifestly inadequate – sentence did not reflect overall gravity of offending and importance of general deterrence and accountability – manifestly inadequate – resentenced
CRIME – federal offences – attempted exportation of regulated native specimens – importation and attempted importation of regulated live specimens – possession of non-native CITES-regulated specimens – dealing with proceeds of crime Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 16A, 19AB, 20AB Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), Pt 5, ss 66, 68 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Criminal Code (Cth), ss 11.1, 400.9 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), ss 303CA, 303DA, 303DD, 303EK, 303GN Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Carroll v The Queen [2009] HCA 13; 83 ALJR 579 Casella v R [2019] NSWCCA 201 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 DL v The Queen [2018] HCA 32; 92 ALJR 764 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297; 246 A Crim R 528 Jones v R [2009] NSWCCA 169 Klein v R (1989) 39 A Crim R 332 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Morgan v R [2007] NSWCCA 8 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Parente v R [2017] NSWCCA 284 R v Cahill [2015] NSWCCA 53 R v Fangaloka [2019] NSWCCA 173 R v JW (2010) 77 NSWLR 7; [2010] NSWCCA 49 R v Pham (2015) 256 CLR 550; [2015] HCA 39 R v Pullen [2018] NSWCCA 264 R v Robison (1992) 62 A Crim R 374 R v Wong [2018] NSWCCA 20 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Martin Brian Kennedy (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Staehli SC / P Boncardo (Appellant) G James QC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate