NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v BB (No 5) [2019] NSWSC 1393 Hearing dates: 26 – 30 August, 03 – 06, 09 – 11, 13, 16 – 20, 23 – 27 September, 02 – 03 October 2019 Date of orders: 03 October 2019 Decision date: 03 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) The transcript of the closing addresses be provided to the jury; (2) The transcript of the summing-up not be provided. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – Jury request for transcript of opening and closing addresses and summing-up – discussion of Jury Act provisions and implied powers – each counsel submitted that the summing-up should not go before the jury, but closing addresses should – Court did not provide opening addresses, nor summing-up, but provided closing addresses of each counsel Legislation Cited: Criminal Code (Cth) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Jury Act 1977 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Bartle (2003) 181 FLR 1; [2003] NSWCCA 329 R v Sukkar [2005] NSWCCA 54 R v Taousanis [1999] NSWSC 107 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) BB (a pseudonym) (Accused) Representation: Counsel: M McHugh SC / A McGrath (Crown) S Pararajasingham (Accused)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (Crown) Musgrave Legal (Accused) File Number(s): 2016/321930 Publication restriction: Suppression orders made under s 7(1) of the Court Suppression and NPO Act 2010 (NSW)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate