NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Musgrove v R [2019] NSWCCA 245 Hearing dates: 14 October 2019 Date of orders: 16 October 2019 Decision date: 16 October 2019 Before: Bell P at [1]; Simpson AJA at [35]; R A Hulme J at [36] Decision: Leave to appeal refused Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeals against sentence – sentenced for dealing with proceeds of crime – sentenced for knowing participation in a criminal group – whether sentencing judge imposed a manifestly excessive sentence – leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 93T(1), 193B(1) Cases Cited: Alou v R [2019] NSWCCA 231 Dinsdale v R (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Hughes v R [2018] NSWCCA 2 Kerr v R [2016] NSWCCA 218; (2016) 78 MVR 191 Markarian v R (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 R v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ryan Thomas Musgrove (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
S Kluss (Applicant) D Patch (Respondent)
Solicitors:
R Hill (Applicant) C Hyland (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/105188 Publication restriction: N/A Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 3 May 2019 Before: Girdham SC DCJ File Number(s): 2017/105188
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate