NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Austin v Austin [2019] NSWSC 1397 Hearing dates: 28 August 2019 Date of orders: 30 August 2019 Decision date: 30 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hallen J Decision: See Paragraph [63] Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Family Provision – Approval sought of inter vivos release made by the Defendant in respect of his rights to make an application for a family provision order in respect of the estate of his wife, the Plaintiff, in the event she shall become a deceased person – No proceedings extant between the parties and no other familial dispute between them – Section 95 Succession Act 2006 (NSW) – Extent of circumstances considered on approval of inter vivos release – Importance of the parties' right to enter into agreement – Whether inter vivos release made should be approved by Court – Amended release made by the Defendant – Amended release approved Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Abrahams v Abrahams (2015) 13 ASTLR 406; [2015] QCA 286 Affoo v Public Trustee of Queensland (2012) 1 Qd R 408; [2011] QSC 309 Bartlett v Coomber [2008] NSWCA 100 Kelly v Kelly [2019] NSWSC 994 Robinson v Robinson [2019] NSWCA 180 Smith v Smith (No 3) (1986) 161 CLR 217; [1986] HCA 36 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fiona Louise Mac Cormick Austin (Plaintiff) Philip Daniel Austin (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Harding (Plaintiff) Mr M Jassy (Solicitor) (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate