NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hurst [2018] NSWDC 524 Hearing dates: 09 August 2018 Date of orders: 10 August 2018 Decision date: 10 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Bennett SC DCJ Decision: Aggregate sentence of imprisonment of 3 years 9 months with a non-parole period of 1 year 9 months Catchwords: CRIME — Property offences — Destroying or damaging property CRIME — Violent offences — Reckless wounding SENTENCING — Non-parole period — Standard non-parole period SENTENCING — Non-parole period — Standard non-parole period — Muldrock error SENTENCING — Non-parole period — Standard non-parole period — Statutory provision for standard non-parole period for Table offences SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — General principles SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Multiple offences SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Multiple offences — Aggregate sentences SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Purposes of sentencing Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Callaghan [2006] NSWCCA 58 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Nathan Leigh Hurst (Offender) Representation: Felicity Martin (Crown) Leigh Haywood (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate