NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Boensch v Somerville Legal Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 249 Hearing dates: 2 September 2019 Date of orders: 23 October 2019 Decision date: 23 October 2019 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Meagher JA at [2]; Emmett AJA at [3] Decision: Proceedings dismissed with costs. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – Client sought leave to file an amended summons by way of appeal from decisions of the Costs Review Panel – Matter struck out or dismissed by primary judge – Primary judge refused to exercise discretion to set aside orders made by the Costs Appeal Panel
JUDICIAL REVIEW – Whether primary judge's refusal to exercise discretion to grant leave to file the amended appeal summons constitutes jurisdictional error Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow [2019] HCA 29 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58 Franz Boensch as trustee of the Boensch Trust v Scott Darren Pascoe [2015] NSWSC 1882 Pentelow v Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 150 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Franz Boensch (Applicant) Somerville Legal Pty Ltd (First Respondent) District Court of NSW (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M J Wells (Applicant) B Hemsworth (Solicitor) (First Respondent) Submitting Appearance (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate