NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Vintage Marine Art Pty Ltd v Henderson & Cremer (No 1) [2019] NSWCA 251 Hearing dates: 19 September 2019 Date of orders: 19 September 2019 Decision date: 19 September 2019 Before: Bell P at [14] Macfarlan JA at [16] Brereton JA at [2] Decision: (1) Pursuant to Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 14, compliance by the first applicant, Vintage Marine Art Pty Ltd, with Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 7.1(3) be dispensed with.
(2) The second applicant, Gina Edwards, be removed as a party to the proceedings. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – whether corporation can appear by director – whether special circumstances shown – whether Court should dispense with UCPR r 7.1 Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 6.29, 7.1 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 14 Cases Cited: Bay Marine Pty Ltd v Clayton Country Properties Pty Ltd (1986) 8 NSWLR 104 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Vintage Marine Art Pty Ltd (First Applicant) Gina Edwards (Second Applicant) Robert Henderson (First Respondent) Douglas Cremer (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Alexander (Respondents)
Solicitors: McLaughlin & Riordan (Respondents) File Number(s): 2018/380743 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Common Law Citation: [2019] NSWSC 590 Date of Decision: 20 May 2019 Before: Rothman J File Number(s): 2014/344104
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate