NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Sef Gonzales pursuant to s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1412 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 28 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Application dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application under Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 for inquiry into three convictions for murder – where applicant had already appealed unsuccessfully to the Court of Criminal Appeal and made a previous application for a Part 7 inquiry – appropriateness of determining second application – applicant representing himself – misunderstanding of reasons given in respect of previous application – applicant believing judge found new exculpatory evidence – consideration of alleged prejudicial conduct of Crown prosecutor and alleged incompetence of defence counsel – no doubt or question as to applicant's guilt Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) ss 78, 79 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 NSW Cases Cited: Alkhair v R [2016] NSWCCA 4; (2016) 255 A Crim R 419 Application by Roger Cheney pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review Act 2001 (No 1) [2015] NSWSC 291 Application of Dragan Cvetkovic pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2016] NSWSC 260 Application of Pedrana [2000] NSWSC 970; (2000) 117 A Crim R 459 Li v Attorney General for New South Wales [2019] NSWCA 95; (2019) 368 ALR 242 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Re Application of Holland under s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251 Regina v Suey [2001] NSWSC 543 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; [1990] HCA 56 Sinkovich v Attorney General of NSW (2013) 85 NSWLR 783; [2013] NSWCA 383 Tiwary v R [2012] NSWCCA 193 TKWJ v R [2002] HCA 46; (2002) 212 CLR 124 Wood v R (2012) 84 NSWLR 581; [2012] NSWCCA 21 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sef Gonzales (applicant) Attorney General for NSW (respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (self-represented) JS Emmett (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate