NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Eniflat Pty Ltd; Karlos v Tweed Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 150 Hearing dates: 16-18/4/19; 3-5/7/19; 10/7/19, 16/7/19 (written submissions) Date of orders: 18 October 2019 Decision date: 18 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pain J Decision: (1) Development appeal proceedings number 18/384172 dismissed.
(2) Development appeal proceedings number 19/32127 dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL – refusal of development consent for water bottling facility at greater rate than approved in existing operation in rural landscape zone – greatly increased traffic impact on amenity and safety – impact of water extraction on natural systems
APPEAL – refusal of development consent for water bottling facility at greater rate than existing operation in rural landscape zone – increased traffic impact on amenity and road safety – impact of water extraction on natural systems
APPEAL – development control order to stop use of and demolition of unlawful tanks and pipes and limit extraction of water – exercise of discretion under s 8.18 of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 4.15, 4.55, 7.11, 8.7, 8.18, 9.34, Sch 5 Pt 1 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 39 Road Rules 2014 Roads Act 1993 ss 138, 139 State Environmental Planning Policy (Primary Production and Rural Development) 2019 cl 9 State Environmental Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008 cll 2, 7 Tweed Local Environmental Plan 2014 cll 1.2, 2.3, 7.10, 7.15, Land Use Table Water Act 1912 s 116 Water Management Act 2000 Cases Cited: Amazonia Hotels Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2014] NSWLEC 1247 Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Ko-veda Holiday Park Estate Ltd [2008] NSWLEC 181 Blair & Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Curran (Adams' Will) (1939) 62 CLR 464; [1939] HCA 23 Jonah Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (2006) 144 LGERA 408; [2006] NSWLEC 99 Karlos v Tweed Shire Council (2018) 236 LGERA 146; [2018] NSWLEC 164 Kouflidis v Salisbury City Corp (1982) 29 SASR 321 Michael Realty Pty Ltd v Carr [1975] 2 NSWLR 812 Mills v Cooper [1967] 2 QB 459 Mirvac Homes Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 3) (1999) 111 LGERA 233; [1999] NSWLEC 239 Mison v Randwick Municipal Council (1991) 23 NSWLR 734 Renaldo Plus 3 Pty Ltd v Hurstville City Council [2005] NSWLEC 315 Rich v Lennox Palms Estate [2009] NSWLEC 167 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 507; [2015] HCA 28 Van Haasteren v South Sydney Council (2000)109 LGERA 252; [2000] NSWLEC 168 Warringah Shire Council v Sedevcic (1987) 10 NSWLR 335 Young v Parramatta City Council [No 2] (2002) 124 LGERA 361; [2002] NSWLEC 240 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Matter No 18/384157 Eniflat Pty Ltd (Applicant) Tweed Shire Council (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate