NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Karout v R [2019] NSWCCA 253 Hearing dates: 26 August 2019 Date of orders: 18 October 2019 Decision date: 18 October 2019 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Brereton JA at [3] Fullerton J at [79] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal be granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. (3) Bail granted on 16 November 2018 on the release application is revoked. (4) The sentence of two years imprisonment with a non-parole period of one year imposed in the District Court on 6 November 2018 is confirmed. (5) Pursuant to s 18(2) of Criminal Appeal Act, the non‑parole period will expire on 5 October 2020 and the balance of term on 5 October 2021. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence– knowingly take part in supply of a prohibited drug – offence not carrying standard non-parole period – whether sentencing judge entitled to increase objective seriousness by matter inferred from agreed facts – whether judge erred in failing to take into account community safety and in particular whether ICO or fulltime custody more likely to address risk of reoffending – whether disparity established – whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 66 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) ss 25(1), (2) Cases Cited: Ali v R [2010] NSWCCA 35 Casella v R [2019] NSWCCA 201 Gommeson v R [2012] NSWCCA 226 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Hughes v R [2018] NSWCCA 2 Hunter v R [2011] NSWCCA 141 Khoury v R [2011] NSWCCA 118 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Markarian v R (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Parente v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 633; [2017] NSWCCA 284 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 R v Fangaloka [2019] NSWCCA 173 R v Georgopoulos [2010] NSWCCA 246 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 R v Prasad, Krishnan, Prakash & Milford [2000] NSWCCA 539 R v Pullen [2018] NSWCCA 264 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Salafia v R [2015] NSWCCA 141 Thomas v R [2019] NSWCCA 88 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hassan Karout (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G James QC (Applicant) K Jeffreys (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate