NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Stejskal v Hely & Ors [2019] NSWSC 1417 Hearing dates: 16 October 2019 Date of orders: 17 October 2019 Decision date: 17 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Kunc J Decision: Additional provision ordered Catchwords: SUCCESSION — family provision and maintenance — failure by testator to make sufficient provision for applicant — father leaves only adult son small pecuniary legacy with most of estate left to charities — Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 59, 60 Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow [2019] HCA 29 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 (HL) Evans v Levy [2011] NSWCA 125 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales [1962] HCA 19; (1962) 107 CLR 9 Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Steinmetz v Shannon [2019] NSWCA 114; (2019) 368 ALR 161 Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tomas Stejskal (Plaintiff)
Joanne Robyn Hely (First Defendant) Jeffrey Sean Agius (Second Defendant) Justin Betar (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel:
J E F Brown (Plaintiff) N Bilinsky (Defendants)
Solicitors:
Marsdens Lawyers (Plaintiff)
Betar Lawyers (Defendants) File Number(s): 2018/310576 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate