NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Warwick (No.75) [2019] NSWSC 1435 Hearing dates: 21 October 2019 Date of orders: 21 October 2019 Decision date: 21 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: (1) Subject to any further application which may be made in respect of the witnesses named in paragraphs 1(a), (b), and (c), the balance of orders 1 and 2 of the Notice of Motion dated 21 October 2019 are dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Evidence – Witnesses – Application to the court to recall a witness - Power of the Court to order the Crown to call witnesses – Principles for recalling witnesses in The Queen v Apostilides – Court is not required to compel Crown to call witnesses - Court is not required to compel Crown to give reasons – Not "exceptional circumstances requiring court to order calling of witnesses Legislation Cited: Not Applicable Cases Cited: The Queen v Apostilides [1984] HCA 38; 154 CLR 563 R v Warwick (No.53) [2018] NSWSC 1714 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Crown Leonard John Warwick (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K McKay / G Christofi (Crown) I Benson (Accused)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) A R Conolly & Co File Number(s): 2015/222068 Publication restriction: Suppression order in relation to the names of the Accused's wife and daughter: see R v Warwick (No.7) [2018] NSWSC 236. Revoked by direction of Garling J on 21.8.2020.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate