NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lithgow State Mine Railway Ltd v City of Greater Lithgow Mining Museum Inc (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1468 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 28 October 2019 Decision date: 28 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Orders to be made for specific performance of an agreement to transfer a lot created by a subdivision. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – formation – defendant the owner of site of former coal mine – land includes a railway corridor – proposal for separation of defendant's railway activities from its museum activities – where plaintiffs were incorporated to take over the defendant's railway operations – proposal to subdivide the defendant's land so as to create a new lot with respect to the railway corridor and to convey that lot to the first plaintiff for nominal consideration – agreement in principle followed by co-operation over a lengthy period in obtaining approval for and effecting completion of subdivision – where defendant subsequently refused to convey railway corridor lot – whether binding agreement reached – binding agreement held to exist – defendant obliged to transfer rail corridor lot to first plaintiff – orders to be made for specific performance of agreement Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 54A Cases Cited: Axelsen v O'Brien (1949) 80 CLR 219 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153; [2001] NSWCA 61 Coles v Trecothick (1804) 9 Ves 234; 32 ER 592 Costin v Costin [1994] NSW Conv R 55-715 Costin v Costin (1997) 7 BPR 97,362 Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corp (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 11,110 Lithgow State Mine Railway Ltd v City of Greater Lithgow Mining Museum Inc [2019] NSWSC 1131 Seller v Jones [2014] NSWCA 19 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 Texts Cited: I C F Spry, The Principles of Equitable Remedies (Ninth Edition, 2014, Lawbook Co.) N Seddon, 'Is a Provider of Nominal Consideration a "Volunteer"?' (2016) 90 Australian Law Journal 81 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lithgow State Mine Railway Ltd (First Plaintiff) COC Ltd (Second Plaintiff) City of Greater Lithgow Mining Museum Inc (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr R K Weaver (Plaintiffs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate