NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Morgan v Sutherland Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 1522 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 25 October 2019 Date of orders: 30 October 2019 Decision date: 30 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application to rely upon the amended plans and documents as set out in condition 1 of Annexure A and the amended clause 4.6 written request. (2) The Applicant's written request under clause 4.6 of the Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015 (LEP) seeking a variation of the development control for height of buildings set out in clause 4.3(2B) of the LEP is upheld. (3) The appeal is upheld. (4) Development Application No DA18/0755 is determined by approving the subdivision of an existing allotment into two lots and construction of an attached dual occupancy development on Proposed Lot 2 with Torrens Title Subdivision of the new dual occupancy at Lot 18 of DP 23446, known as 6 Rossford Avenue, Jannali subject to conditions of consent as set out in Annexure A. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – dual occupancy and subdivision of land – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jennifer Dianne Morgan (Applicant) Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Vergotis (Solicitor) (Applicant) J Amy (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate