NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Kinghorn (No 5) [2019] NSWSC 1473 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 28 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: Rulings on privilege made. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – subpoenas – claims for privilege – whether waiver imputed
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – review of earlier ruling of court's own motion Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 117, 118, 119 Cases Cited: Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300; [1993] HCA 6 Consolidated Lawyers Ltd v Abu-Mahmoud [2016] NSWCA 4 Nominal Defendant v Livaja [2011] NSWCA 121 R v Kinghorn (No 4) [2019] NSWSC 1420 R v Leach [2019] 1 Qd R 459; [2018] QCA 131 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Applicant on the privilege motion) Commissioner of Taxation (Applicant on the privilege motion) Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Applicant on the privilege motion) John Alan Kinghorn (Accused) Representation: Counsel: D Staehli SC/K Curry (Crown) J Renwick SC/A Garsia (Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions) T Howe QC/P Melican (Commissioner of Taxation, Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police) B Walker SC/S Buchen SC/G Huxley/H Atkin (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate