NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: TL & TL Tradings Pty Ltd v City of Parramatta Council [2019] NSWLEC 160 Hearing dates: 22 October 2019; further written submissions 28 October 2019 Date of orders: 01 November 2019 Decision date: 01 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Robson J Decision: See orders at [47] and [48] Catchwords: NOTICE OF MOTION – deemed refusal of application to modify development consent which provided for use of land as a brothel subject to a two-year trial period – modification sought a continuation of the use on a permanent basis – motion filed by applicant to strike out sole contention in respondent's statement of facts and contentions and vacate conciliation conference listed – motion dismissed – conciliation conference listing vacated Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) ss 4.15, 4.56, 8.11, 96 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) s 23 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Pts 14, 15, 31, Sch 7, rr 14.1, 15.1, 31.19, 31.20, 31.24 Cases Cited: I V Trading Pty Limited v Parramatta City Council [2010] NSWLEC 1170 Jonah Pty Limited v Pittwater Council [2006] NSWLEC 99; (2006) 144 LGERA 408 Kouflidis v City of Salisbury (1982) 29 SASR 321; (1982) 49 LGRA 17 Ralph Lauren Pty Ltd v New South Wales Transitional Coastal Panel; Stewartville Pty Ltd v New South Wales Transitional Coastal Panel; Robert Watson v New South Wales Transitional Coastal Panel [2018] NSWLEC 207 Sertari Pty Ltd v Quakers Hill SPV Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 340 TL & TL Tradings Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council [2016] NSWLEC 150 Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 51 NSWLR 589; [2001] NSWCA 167 Texts Cited: Land and Environment Court of New South Wales Practice Note – Class 1 Development Appeals Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: TL & TL Tradings Pty Ltd (Applicant) City of Parramatta Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Gadiel, solicitor (Applicant) M Astill (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate