NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bobolas v Waverley Council (No 4) [2019] NSWLEC 163 Hearing dates: 24, 25 and 30 September and 3, 14 and 15 October 2019 Date of orders: 31 October 2019 Decision date: 31 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Moore J Decision: In Matter No 208865 of 2019 (formerly Matter No 41027 of 2014), see orders at [129]; and In Matter No 50888 of 2018, see orders at [130] Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW - Notice of Motion seeking review of orders made in two earlier Class 4 proceedings - the first earlier proceedings (concerning Court orders made in 2015) related to accumulation of waste on residential premises - unsafe outbuilding on the property - and potential safety risks arising from unconstrained vegetation growing over the roof of the dwelling on the property - orders made in 2015 for substituted performance by the Council for removal of waste on the property after failure of occupants to effect removal - waste removal carried out - order for waste removal exhausted - order for removal of unsafe outbuilding not satisfied - order for removal of vegetation partially satisfied - challenge to ongoing validity of unfulfilled orders - unfulfilled orders remain valid - order that the respondents refrain from keeping further waste on the property - clear from the site inspection that that order has been breached and there is presently a significant accumulation of waste on the property - no current order that would permit access to the property to rectify the breach - appropriate to provide an opportunity for the Council to seek a further access order to rectify breach - proceedings adjourned to provide Council with an opportunity to seek access orders JUDICIAL REVIEW - Notice of Motion seeking review of orders made in two earlier Class 4 proceedings - the second earlier proceedings (concerning Court orders made in 2018) related to accumulation of waste on residential premises - Court orders made in 2018 for substituted performance by the Council for removal of waste on the property after failure of occupants to effect removal - waste removal carried out in February 2019 - Council serves notices of intention to undertake further waste removal following additional accumulation of waste since February 2019 clean-up - notices based on asserted continuing operation of Order 22A of table to s 124 of the Local Government Act 1993 issued to the applicants on 22 November 2017 - was the 22A Order for waste removal exhausted? - terms of order were to remove waste within 28 days - the 22A Order did not require those to whom the order was issued to refrain from keeping waste on the premises - the 22A Order is exhausted - no basis for the Council to rely on the 22A Order for further waste removal activities - declaration appropriate and orders to restrain the Council from undertaking further clean-up activities in reliance on the Order 22A issued to the applicants on 22 November 2017 COSTS - costs reserved. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Interpretation Act 1987, ss s 34(2)(f), 76 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 22, 63(1) Land and Environment Court Rules 1979, r 7.7 Local Government Act 1993, ss 124 Order 22A, 128A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 6.24, 36.11, 36.15, 36.16 Cases Cited: Bobolas v Waverley Council [2016] NSWCA 139 Bobolas v Waverley Council [2019] NSWLEC 148 Bobolas v Waverley Council (No 2) [2019] NSWLEC 157 Bobolas v Waverley Council (No 3) [2019] NSWLEC 162 Northey v Bega Valley Shire Council [2012] NSWCA 28 Waverley Council v Bobolas (No 2) [2015] NSWLEC 66 Waverley Council v Bobolas (No 2) [2018] NSWLEC 144 Texts Cited: Civil Trials Bench Book, Judicial Commission of NSW Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mary Bobolas (First Applicant - in Matter No 41027 of 2014 only) Elena Bobolas (Second Applicant in both matters) Liana Bobolas (Third Applicant in both matters) Waverley Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms E Bobolas in person (and as agent for Ms M Bobolas in Matter No 41027 of 2014) Ms L Bobolas in person Mr R Lancaster SC/Ms J Reid, barrister (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate