NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Michael Ryan v Northern Regional Planning Panel (No 3) [2019] NSWLEC 168 Hearing dates: 31 October 2019 Date of orders: 01 November 2019 Decision date: 01 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Robson J Decision: See orders at [71] Catchwords: INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION – whether activity relying upon an allegedly invalid consent should be restrained – threatened species – flood risk – whether there is a serious question to be tried – whether the balance of convenience favours granting the injunction – motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) ss 1.7, 5A, 5AA, 9.46 Heritage Act 1977 (NSW) s 139 Lismore Local Environmental Plan 2012 cl 6.3 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) s 86 State Environmental Planning Policy No 44—Koala Habitat Protection Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Beecham Group Limited v Bristol Laboratories Pty Limited (1968) 118 CLR 618; [1968] HCA 1 Iseek Communications Pty Ltd v Jones [2017] NSWSC 251 Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 Mekhail v Hana; Mekail v Hana; In the Estate of Nadia Mekhail (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1175 Michael Ryan v Joint Regional Planning Panel [2019] NSWLEC 21 Michael Ryan v Northern Regional Planning Panel (No 2) [2019] NSWLEC 167 Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (No 3) (1998) 195 CLR 1; [1998] HCA 30 Positive Change for Marine Life Inc v Byron Shire Council (No 2) [2015] NSWLEC 157 SAI Global Property Division Pty Ltd (ACN 089 586 872) v Jones [2018] NSWSC 438 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238; [2011] FCAFC 156 Tegra (NSW) Pty Ltd v Gundagai Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 806; (2007) 160 LGERA 1 Texts Cited: Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (5th ed 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Michael Ryan (Applicant) Northern Regional Planning Panel (First Respondent) Lismore City Council (Second Respondent) Winten (No 12) Pty Ltd (Third Respondent) W A Sexton (Fourth Respondent) Glorbill Pty Ltd (Fifth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L M Saw (Applicant) R Beasley SC (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate