NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tang v R [2019] NSWCCA 267 Hearing dates: 21 October 2019 Date of orders: 06 November 2019 Decision date: 06 November 2019 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Walton J at [2]; Price J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – dangerous driving causing death – whether sentence manifestly excessive – guideline judgment of Whyte – strong subjective case - elderly driver Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 52A(1)(c) Cases Cited: Barbaro v The Queen; Zirili v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58; [2014] HCA 2 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Kerr v R [2016] NSWCCA 218 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209; [1998] NSWSC 423 R v McLean [2001] NSWCCA 58; (2001) 121 A Crim R 484 R v Musumeci (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 30 October 1997, unrep) R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343 Stanyard v R [2013] NSWCCA 134 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jian Li Tang (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Goodwin (Applicant) Ms C Curtis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate