NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Crimmins v R [2019] NSWCCA 268 Hearing dates: 2 October 2019 Date of orders: 08 November 2019 Decision date: 08 November 2019 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Johnson J at [2] Fullerton J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – recklessly causing grievous bodily harm – whether sentencing judge erred in failing to find the applicant was remorseful – whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Hughes v R [2018] NSWCCA 2 R v Loveridge [2014] NSWCCA 120; 243 A Crim R 31 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maxwell Crimmins (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J O'Sullivan (Applicant) M Millward (Crown)
Solicitors: O'Brien Winter Partners (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2017/248533 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 18 October 2018 Before: Wilson SC DCJ File Number(s): 2017/248533
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate