NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Sandon Capital Investments Limited [2019] NSWSC 1512 Hearing dates: 9 August 2019 Date of orders: 09 August 2019 Decision date: 09 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Orders made for extending time for compliance with s 625(3)(c)(i) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Orders made validating late dispatch of bidder's statement to shareholders whose shares were quoted on NZX under s 1322(4)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – take-over offers – off-market bid – application for extension of time for compliance with s 625(3)(c)(i) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where transaction timetable specified time for lodgement of application for quotation of additional securities as within 7 days of commencement of offer period – where time specified for lodgement of application should have been within 7 days of commencement of bid period – whether extension of time sought should be granted.
CORPORATIONS – take-over offers – bidder's statement – application for extension of time for dispatch of bidder's statement – where bidder's statement dispatched to shareholders of shares quoted on NZX six days after dispatch to shareholders of shares quoted on ASX due to communication error – where persons concerned acted honestly and without improper intent – where no substantial injustice has been or is likely to be caused to any person – whether an order should be made under ss 1322(4)(a) or 1325A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Legislation Cited: - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 625(3)(c), 625(3)(c)(i), 633, 633(1), 659B, 1311, 1322, 1322(4)(a), 1322(4)(d), 1322(6), 1325A, 1325A(1), 1325A(2), 1325D; Sch 3 Cases Cited: - FE Ltd v Padbury Mining Ltd [2010] FCA 1207 - Re Activistic Ltd [2016] FCA 1520 - Re Clime Capital Limited [2019] NSWSC 1479 - Re Venturex Resources Ltd (2009) 72 ACSR 358 - Re Wave Capital Ltd [2003] FCA 969; (2003) 47 ACSR 418 - Sheahan v Londish [2010] NSWCA 270; (2010) 80 ACSR 337 - Weinstock v Beck [2013] HCA 14; (2013) 93 ACSR 231 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sandon Capital Investments Limited (Plaintiff) Representation: Counsel: C Tam/T Rogan (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate