NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DXJ v Health Administration Corporation [2019] NSWCATAD 230 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 06 November 2019 Decision date: 06 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Ludlow, Senior Member Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the Tribunal dispenses with a hearing in these proceedings. (2) The Tribunal finds that the conduct of the respondent under review did not breach Health Privacy Principle 10. (3) Pursuant to s 55(2) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 no action will be taken in the matter. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – privacy – health information – purpose of collection – use or disclosure – whether purpose of use was the same as the purpose for which the information was collected Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Heath Records Information Privacy Act 2002 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Cases Cited: AF v Minister for Health [2012] NSWADTAP 61 ALZ v Workcover NSW [2015] NSWCATAP 138; ALZ v SafeWork NSW (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAD 121 BVS v Sydney Local Health District [2015] NSW CATAD 171 CBL v Southern Cross University [2018] NSWCATAP 236 FM v Macquarie University [2003] NSWADT 78 GL v Department of Education and Training [2003] NSWADT 166 JD v Department of Health (NSW) [2005] NSWADTAP 44 NZ v Department of Housing [2005] NSWADT 58 OA v Department of Housing [2005] NSWADT 233 RL v Department of Education and Training [2009] NSWADT 257 ZR v Department of Education and Training [2010] NSWADTAP 75 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: DXJ (Applicant) Health Administration Corporation (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/00199354 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the publication of the name of the applicant is prohibited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate