NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Pham; R v Nguyen; R v Trinh [2019] NSWSC 1539 Hearing dates: 04 November 2019 Decision date: 06 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: (1) The jury are directed to return a verdict of not guilty in the case of Mr Pham. (2) The application of Mr Nguyen for a verdict of not guilty by direction is refused. (3) The application of Mr Trinh for a verdict of not guilty by direction is refused. Catchwords: CRIME – murder – applications for directed verdicts – six accused charged with murder – three accused make applications – circumstantial case – appropriate legal test – where cause of death stab wound to chest – where doubt over knowledge of the presence of a knife – distinction between rational inference and speculation Cases Cited: Bloodsworth v R [2019] NSWCCA 260 Doney v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 207; [1990] HCA 51 Duong, Lu, Do & Tran (1992) 61 A Crim R 140 R v JMR (1991) 57 A Crim R 39 R v Le & Loeung [2019] NSWSC 632 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 59) [2016] NSWSC 1159 The Queen v A2, Magennis & Vaziri [2019] HCA 35 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Jason Pham Voung Van Nguyen Minh Duc Trinh Representation: Counsel: L Lungo (Regina) R Wilson SC (Pham) B Hancock (Nguyen) S Schaudin (Trinh)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate