NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Como Leather Pty Ltd v Kerr [2019] NSWCATAP 268 Hearing dates: 10 September 2019 Date of orders: 07 November 2019 Decision date: 07 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: G Curtin SC, Senior Member G Sarginson, Senior Member Decision: 1. Stay of orders 1 and 2 of the Tribunal below made on 25 July 2019 is lifted. 2. Leave to appeal in relation to Ground 3 is refused. 3. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – adequacy of reasons - representation as to material – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 62(2), 62(3), 80(2)(b), clause 12(1)(b) and (c) of Schedule 4 Cases Cited: Cominos v Di Rico [2016] NSWCATAP 5 New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation v Orr [2019] NSWCA 231 Pollard v RRR Corporation Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 110 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Como Leather Pty Ltd (Appellant) Christine Kerr (First Respondent) Trevor Kerr (Second Respondent) Representation: Kylie Jordemir (Director of the Appellant) Respondents (Self-represented) File Number(s): AP 19/31468 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 25 June 2019 Before: S Hanstein, General Member File Number(s): GEN 19/14172
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate