NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Priday v R [2019] NSWCCA 272 Hearing dates: 12 August 2019 Date of orders: 13 November 2019 Decision date: 13 November 2019 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Johnson J at [158]; Lonergan J at [159] Decision: (1) To the extent necessary, grant the appellant leave to appeal against his convictions of offences of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and aggravated sexual intercourse without consent.
(2) Dismiss the appeal against those convictions.
(3) Refuse the appellant leave to appeal against sentence. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – hearsay exceptions – criminal trial – maker of representations deceased – whether representations made in circumstances that made it unlikely that they were fabrications – s 65(2)(b) Evidence Act – representations made soon after alleged events to persons in authority, with maker exhibiting injuries consistent with representations
CRIME – appeals – whether misdirection to jury as to mental element of consent in relation to sexual assault offence resulted in any substantial miscarriage of justice – misdirection in written and oral directions – whether erroneous direction could have affected jury's verdict – no substantial miscarriage of justice – Kalbasi v Western Australia (2018) 264 CLR 62 considered
CRIME – appeals – whether trial miscarried because of irregularities in the Crown's address to the jury
CRIME – appeals – whether trial miscarried because of incompetence of accused's trial counsel – appeal ground rejected
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate