NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Rogowski-Dann [2019] NSWDC 638 Hearing dates: 6 - 7 August 2019 Decision date: 07 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Norrish QC DCJ Decision: I decline to make the order sought by the accused Catchwords: CRIME – Trial - notice of motion for stay of proceedings until cost of previous trial are paid – "Mosely" order - jury discharged after officer in charge gave evidence that raised matters of prejudice – trial judge considered this could not be cured by direction Cases Cited: Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292, Hufnagl v DPP (Cth) (2007) NSWDC 130 Jaygo v the District Court of New South Wales [1989] 168 CLR 23) Le v Attorney General of New South Wales (2017) NSWCCA 27 Petroulias v R (2007) NSWCCA 154 R v Fisher (2003) 183 A Crim R 318). R v Mosely (1992) 28 NSWLR 735 R v Selim (2007) NSWSC 154 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Mr Jacob Rogowski-Dann (accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms Talbert (Crown) Mr Rajalingam (accused/applicant) File Number(s): 2017/00262289 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. In relation to the matter of Rogowski‑Dann, I decline to make the orders sought by the applicant and I will give my reasons now. Application is made by notice of motion, filed on behalf of the applicant Jacob Rogowski‑Dann, for a stay of proceedings related to a trial that is listed to commence on 19 August 2019.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate