NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ludwig v Jeffrey [2019] NSWSC 1550 Hearing dates: 18 October 2019 Date of orders: 08 November 2019 Decision date: 08 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Proceedings not stayed. Directions made for the further conduct of the proceedings. Costs of the motion reserved. Proceedings referred for Court annexed mediation. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – stay of proceedings under Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 67 – the plaintiffs and the defendant are registered proprietors as joint tenants of real estate held under Real Property Act 1900 – defendant concedes that he holds his interest as joint tenant on trust for the plaintiffs – plaintiffs seek transfer of the defendant's interests as joint tenant to them – plaintiffs and defendant accept that the plaintiff must indemnify the defendant in respect of his holding of the trust property – transfer of the trust property by the defendant to the plaintiffs may cause the defendant to incur capital gains tax ("CGT") liability – defendant seeks private binding ruling from Commissioner of Taxation and seeks a stay of proceedings until the ruling is available – plaintiffs say proceedings should continue and that trust property be transferred to them – whether or not the proceedings should be stayed pending receipt of the private binding ruling. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 67 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), Schedule 1, Part 5-5 Cases Cited: Balkin v Peck (1998) 43 NSWLR 706 Commissioner of Taxation v Australian Building Systems Pty Ltd (in liq) (2015) 257 CLR 544 Lym International Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation [2011] NSWSC 927 Saunders v Vautier (1841) 4 Beav 115 Taras Nominees Pty Ltd as Trustee for Burnley Street Trust v Commissioner of Taxation (2015) 228 FCR 418 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: First Plaintiff/respondent: Joanne Elizabeth Ludwig Second Plaintiff/respondent: Robert Walter Ludwig Defendant/applicant: Lynton Barrett Jeffrey Representation: Counsel: Plaintiffs/respondents: J. R. B. Pearson Defendant/applicant: C.T. Ensor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate