NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Beaini Projects Pty Ltd v Cumberland Council [2019] NSWLEC 1547 Hearing dates: 23 September, 21 October 2019 Date of orders: 06 December 2019 Decision date: 11 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The application to modify the consent for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a 12-storey mixed used development at 108 Station Street, Wentworthville, by amending the conditions of consent, is granted. (2) The development consent (2018/110/1) for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a 12-storey mixed used development at 108 Station Street, Wentworthville is now subject to the modified conditions of development consent in Annexure A. Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION – developer contributions – conditions require public road to be constructed over land dedicated as a laneway – agreed material public benefit – whether there is power to amend the contribution – basis for reducing contribution Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 2013 Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 2013 (Amendment No 16) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Roads Act 1993 Cases Cited: Arkibuilt Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council (2006) 67 NSWLR 529 Beaini Projects Pty Ltd v Cumberland Council [2018] NSWLEC 1603 City West Housing Pty Limited v Council of the City of Sydney [2002] NSWLEC 30 Colonial Credits Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council [2015] NSWLEC 188 North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates Pty Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 468 Progress and Securities Building Pty Ltd v Burwood Council (No 2) (2008) 158 LGERA 102; [2008] NSWLEC 135 Texts Cited: Holroyd Development Control Plan 2013 Holroyd Section 94 Contributions Plan 2013 Wentworthville Centre Planning and Place Making Strategy Category: Principal judgment Parties: Beaini Projects Pty Ltd (Applicant) Cumberland Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: N Eastman (Applicant) T To (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate