NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ebrahami v R [2019] NSWCCA 273 Hearing dates: 17 July 2019 Decision date: 13 November 2019 Before: Leeming JA at [1] Davies J at [2] Hidden AJ at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal granted, appeal allowed. Aggregate sentence in the District Court quashed. In lieu, applicant sentenced to aggregate sentence of 8 years with a non-parole period of 5 years, from 11 August 2017. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against sentence – supply commercial quantity of methylamphetamine, dealing with proceeds of crime – challenge to sentencing judge's assessment of objectiveness seriousness of drug supply offence – whether aggregate sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 193B Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 25, 29 Cases Cited: Abdul v R [2019] NSWCCA 18 Assam v R [2019] NSWCCA 12 Battersby v R [2018] NSWCCA 141 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 DS v R [2017] NSWCCA 37 Gilmour v R [2018] NSWCCA 295 Healey v R [2018] NSWCCA 214 Hili & Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Matu v R [2019] NSWCCA 23 Mihelic v R [2019] NSWCCA 2 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Salafia v R [2015] NSWCCA 141 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mostafa Ebrahimi (Applicant) The Queen (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ian McLachlan (Applicant) Catherine Gleeson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate