NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Vaughan v Curran [2019] NSWSC 1562 Hearing dates: 14, 15 October 2019 Decision date: 11 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Emmett AJA Decision: Orders made by consent in accordance with Appendix 1 and Appendix 2. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Application for family provision orders under Ch 3 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) – Factors warranting the making of the applications – Whether sufficient cause has been shown under s 58(2) of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) – Whether there are special circumstances that justify the making of a notional estate order under s 79 of the Act. Legislation Cited: Adoption Act 2000 (NSW) Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cetojevic v Cetojevic [2006] NSWSC 431 Gourlay v Casey (1927) 38 CLR 586; [1927] HCA 6 Category: Principal judgment Parties: 2018/80076 Lurrain Vaughan (Plaintiff) Allen Andrew Curran (First Defendant) Edward John Curran (Second Defendant) Jennifer Rhonda Ann Westland (Third Defendant)
2018/182471 Fallon O'Brien (First Plaintiff) Sarah Micallef (Second Plaintiff) Allen Andrew Curran (First Defendant) Edward John Curran (Second Defendant) Jennifer Rhonda Ann Westland (Third Defendant) Representation: 2018/80076 Counsel: M Sneddon (Plaintiff) M Pringle (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate