NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Murray v Raynor [2019] NSWCA 274 Hearing dates: 8 October 2019 Date of orders: 13 November 2019 Decision date: 13 November 2019 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Payne JA at [2]; Emmett AJA at [99] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Set aside the orders of Gibson DCJ made on 17 May 2019 and in lieu thereof order: (a) Further amended statement of claim dismissed; (b) Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs. (3) Respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defences – common law qualified privilege – where privileged occasion not identified – relevance of privileged occasion – malice not established – necessary factual findings not supported by evidence Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: Adam v Ward [1917] AC 309 Alexander v Clegg [2004] 3 NZLR 586 Assaf v Skalkos [2000] NSWSC 418 Attrill v Christie [2007] NSWSC 1386 Bashford v Information Australia (Newsletters) Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 366; [2004] HCA 5 Bauer Media v Wilson (2018) 56 VR 674; [2018] VSCA 154 Born Brands Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (No 6) [2013] NSWSC 1651 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Carolan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 6) [2016] NSWSC 1091 Chel v Fairfax Media Publications (No 7) [2017] NSWSC 996 Cush v Dillon (2011) 243 CLR 298; [2011] HCA 30 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited v Gayle [2019] NSWCA 172 Fraser v Holmes [2009] NSWCA 36 Hanrahan v Ainsworth (1990) 22 NSWLR 73 Harbour Radio Pty Ltd v Ahmed [2015] NSWCA 290 Harbour Radio Pty Ltd v Trad (2012) 247 CLR 31; [2012] HCA 44 Heytesbury Holdings Pty Ltd v City of Subiaco (1998) 19 WAR 440; [1998] WASC 183 Kim Anne Ahmed v Harbour Radio Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 1928 Kuru v State of New South Wales (2008) 236 CLR 1; [2008] HCA 26 LVMH Watch & Jewellery Australia Pty Ltd v Michael Lassanah & Ors [2011] NSWCA 370 Marshall v Megna [2013] NSWCA 30 Megna v Marshall [2010] NSWSC 686 Penton v Calwell (1945) 70 CLR 219; [1945] HCA 51 Roberts v Bass (2002) 212 CLR 1; [2002] HCA 57 Skalkos v Assaf (2002) Aust Torts Reports 81-644; [2002] NSWCA 14 Tabbaa v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 69 Tabbaa v Nine Network Pty Ltd (No 10) [2018] NSWSC 468 Toogood v Spyring (1834) 1 Cr M & R 181 at 193; 149 ER 1044 Trad v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 750 Visscher v Maritime Union of Australia (No 6) (2014) 98 NSWLR 764; [2014] NSWSC 350 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491; [1988] HCA 12 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patricia Murray (Appellant) Gary Raynor (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B McClintock SC, S Chrysanthou, P Hart (Appellant) R Potter, A Munro (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate