NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Luben Petkovski v Kai Yin Huang (No. 3) [2019] NSWSC 1566 Hearing dates: 10 & 11 September 2019 Date of orders: 14 November 2019 Decision date: 14 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Conclusion that but for the first cross-defendant's misconduct the cross-claimants would have purchased one lot and had a 30% chance of acquiring two other lots, of the three lots they did not acquire. Catchwords: UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT – causation of loss –findings in principal judgment that the defendant/first cross-claimant deprived of the opportunity to purchase three of six properties by the first cross-defendant's misleading, deceptive and unconscionable conduct – wrongdoer deters an associate of the defendant/cross-claimants from sharing in the purchase of two of the six properties – on what basis should damages be assessed against the cross-defendants: on the basis that the cross-claimants would have purchased a single additional property or an additional three properties.
TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES – reimbursement and indemnity under Trust Deeds for trustees' trust-related expenditure – principal judgment makes a finding that the defendants/cross-claimants are trustees for the cross-defendants in the acquisition and development of certain properties – defendants/cross-claimants seek to set aside the Trust Deeds – defendants/cross claimants claim reimbursement and indemnity under the Trust Deeds for trustees' trust-related expenditure – whether their expenditure is recoverable. Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 - Australian Consumer Law, ss 18, 236 Property Stock and Business Agents Act 2002, s 49 Cases Cited: Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459 Houghton v Immer (No. 55) Pty Ltd (1997) 44 NSWLR 46 Luben Petkovski v Kai Yin Huang [2018] NSWSC 1667 Luben Petkovski v Kai Yin Huang (No. 2) [2019] NSWSC 1563 Ramsay v BigTinCan Pty Ltd (2014) 101 ACSR 415 Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Luben Petkovski (first plaintiff, first cross-defendant) Diana Petkovski (second plaintiff, second cross-defendant) George Gashovski (third plaintiff, third cross-defendant) Lence Petkovski (fourth plaintiff, fourth cross-defendant) Kai Yin Huang (defendant, first cross-claimant) Xuan Jing Huang (second cross-claimant) Representation: Counsel: D A Moujalli (plaintiffs/cross-defendants) J S Wheelhouse SC, J E Doyon (defendant /cross-claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate