NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hickson (No. 1) [2019] NSWSC 1572 Hearing dates: 11 November 2019 Date of orders: 11 November 2019 Decision date: 12 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: See paragraphs [23] and [32] Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - trial - opening address to jury by Crown Prosecutor – whether Prosecutor should be permitted to pen case to jury on alternative basis of joint criminal enterprise – whether there is evidence of involvement of another person
EVIDENCE – circumstantial Crown case – allegation that accused injured in attack on the deceased -whether evidence of medical consultation by accused later on the day of the murder was relevant and admissible Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 137 Cases Cited: Cooper v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 258; (2011) 215 A Crim R 149 Cooper v The Queen [2012] HCA 50; (2012) 87 ALJR 32 Doney v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 207; [1990] HCA 51 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Sever v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 135 The Queen v A2; The Queen v Magennis; The Queen v Vaziri [2019] HCA 35 Wood v R (2012) 84 NSWLR 581; [2012] NSWCCA 21 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Crown Terry John Hickson (Accused) Representation: Counsel: C Everson (Crown) P D Young SC (Accused)
Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Ross Hill & Associate Solicitors (Accused) File Number(s): 2017/331768
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate