NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Zhao v Wu (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1585 Hearing dates: 13 November 2019 Decision date: 14 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: See [33] Catchwords: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – debt – payable immediately or on demand – usual rule of construction that time runs from date of advance for loan repayable on demand – whether displaced by clear language
APPEALS – failure by magistrate to address limitation defence – whether Supreme Court can determine proceedings or whether remitter required Legislation Cited: Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), ss 14, 54, 63 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), s 39, 40, 41 Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW), s 6 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 14.4 Cases Cited: Codelfa Construction Proprietary Limited v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337; [1982] HCA 24 Fischer v Nemeske Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 203; Fischer v Nemeske Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 6 Fischer v Nemeske Pty Ltd (2016) 257 CLR 615; [2016] HCA 11 In the matter of Italasia Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 811 Ogilvie v Adams [1981] VR 1041 Rose v Tunstall [2018] NSWCA 241 Wende v Horwath (NSW) Pty Ltd (2014) 86 NSWLR 674; [2014] NSWCA 170 Wu v Zhao [2018] NSWSC 1182 Young v Queensland Trustees Limited (1956) 99 CLR 560; [1956] HCA 51 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ying Zhao (Plaintiff) Jao Wu (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Condon SC (Plaintiff) JC Lee (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate