NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hy-Tec Industries (Queensland) Pty Ltd v Tweed Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 175 Hearing dates: 12 November 2019 Date of orders: 14 November 2019 Decision date: 14 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: See [65] of judgment Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – construction of condition of development consent granted in 2004 concerning amount of material that can be extracted from quarry – no ambiguity in development consent condition
JUDICIAL REVIEW – variation of environment protection licence based on legal error – variation set aside Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 98 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 4.58, 100 (as in force between 1 July 2004 and 30 November 2004) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 266 (as in force between 3 September 2004 and 9 December 2004) Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 45 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 42.1 Cases Cited: Allandale Blue Metal Pty Ltd v Roads and Maritime Services (2013) 195 LGERA 182; [2013] NSWCA 103 House of Peace Pty Ltd v Bankstown City Council (2000) 48 NSWLR 498; [2000] NSWCA 44 Hubertus Schuetzenverein Liverpool Rifle Club Limited v Commonwealth (1994) 85 LGERA 37 Hunter Industrial Rental Equipment Pty Ltd v Dungog Shire Council [2019] NSWCA 147 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; [1990] HCA 59 Oakden Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v City of Port Adelaide Enfield (2004) 137 LGERA 189; [2004] SASC 373 Stebbins v Lismore City Council (1988) 64 LGRA 132 Weston Aluminium Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (2007) 82 ALJR 74; [2007] HCA 50 Winn v Director General of National Parks and Wildlife (2001) 130 LGERA 508; [2001] NSWCA 17 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hy-Tec Industries (Queensland) Pty Ltd (Applicant) Tweed Shire Council (First Respondent) Environment Protection Authority (Second Respondent) Representation: COUNSEL: T Howard SC (Applicant) A Pearman (First Respondent) Submitting appearance (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate