NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Valverde v Inch [2019] NSWSC 1595 Hearing dates: 15 November 2019 Date of orders: 15 November 2019 Decision date: 15 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Applications List Before: Kunc J Decision: Amendment allowed on terms that the newly added defendants are entitled to maintain limitation defences at final hearing Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Originating process — Amendment – Whether proposed amendment statute barred CIVIL PROCEDURE — Parties — Addition of defendant — Date when addition takes effect – Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 65(2)(c), s 65(3) LIMITATION OF ACTIONS — Operation of bar — Joinder of defendant out of time Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ahmed v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 676 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; (1964) 112 CLR 125 Greenwood v Papademetri [2007] NSWCA 221 Valverde v Inch [2018] NSWSC 366; (2019) 19 BPR 39421 Wardley Australia Limited v Western Australia [1992] HCA 55; (1992) 175 CLR 514 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Aurea Valverde (Plaintiff)
Jocelyn Patricia Anne Inch (Defendant) Mark Alexander Phillips (First Respondent) Nicholas John Symons (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate