NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Olsen v Olsen & Ors [2019] NSWCA 278 Hearing dates: 1 October 2019 Decision date: 19 November 2019 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; White JA at [2]; Emmett AJA at [85] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: APPEALS – actual or apprehended bias – unfavourable comments at pre-trial hearing – whether primary judge dissuadable from alleged fixed opinion – criticism of legal representatives – whether justified – whether indicative of bias
SUCCESSION – family provision – claim by adult son – where deceased remarried – where deceased left entire estate to family from second marriage – deceased's moral obligation to widow – discussion of role of freedom of testamentary disposition in family provision claims Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 8, 59, 60, 91 Cases Cited: ALA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 30 Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 577; [2006] HCA 55 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Friend v Brien [2014] NSWSC 613 Gorton v Parks (1989) 17 NSWLR 1 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 In re Sinnott (1948) VLR 279 Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135; [2015] HCA 20 Jamal v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] NSWCA 121 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488; [2000] HCA 48 Kleinig v Neal (No 2) [1981] 2 NSWLR 532 Lloyd-Williams v Mayfield (2005) 63 NSWLR 1; [2005] NSWCA 189 Mayfield v Lloyd-Williams [2004] NSWSC 419 Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 Olsen v Olsen [2019] NSWSC 217 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 107 CLR 9; [1962] HCA 19 Reid v Commercial Club (Albury) Ltd [2014] NSWCA 98 Revell v Revell [2016] NSWSC 947 Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Slack v Rogan (2013) 85 NSWLR 253; [2013] NSWSC 522 Squire v Squire [2019] NSWCA 90 Steinmetz v Shannon [2018] NSWSC 1090 Steinmetz v Shannon [2019] NSWCA 114; (2019) 368 ALR 161 Stott v Cook [1960] 33 ALJR 447 Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 Vakuata v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568; [1989] HCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Craig Olsen (Appellant) Dean Richard Olsen (First Respondent) Micheline Isabelle Olsen (Second Respondent) Faye Beverley Olsen (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Coleman SC with L Clarke (Appellant) M Condon SC with D Robertson and Q Noakhtar (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate