NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Allchin v R; Skepevski v R [2019] NSWCCA 278 Hearing dates: 6 November 2019 Date of orders: 22 November 2019 Decision date: 22 November 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Walton J at [133]; Bellew J at [134] Decision: In each matter:
(1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal his conviction for supplying a prohibited drug.
(2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – appeal against conviction – sole ground that verdict was unreasonable or unsupportable on the evidence – challenges to fairness of trial, improper limit on cross-examination and content of prosecutor's address went beyond the sole pleaded ground – challenges dealt with as separate grounds of appeal
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – supply of commercial quantity of drugs – supply by one co-accused to the other – whether verdict unreasonable – inferences of prior arrangement based on video surveillance – no evidence of prior relationship
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – unfair trial – change in the prosecution case – prosecutor using rhetorical questions in address to jury – failure to put defence case in summing up
EVIDENCE – powers of trial judge to limit cross-examination – application to limit scope of re-examination if prosecution witness cross-examined about drug dealing with third party – risk of questioning causing unfair trial Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 128, 165, 192A
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate