NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Warwick (No.80) [2020] NSWSC 115 Hearing dates: 11 November 2019, 12 November 2019, 13 November 2019, 14 November 2019 18 November 2019 Date of orders: 21 November 2019 Decision date: 24 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: Application for the entry of verdicts of not guilty on the basis that the Accused has no case to answer is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Trial - Judge alone – no case to answer submission - whether the evidence taken at its highest could satisfy a fact finding tribunal beyond reasonable doubt – circumstantial case - application dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden [2001] NSWCA 32; (2001) 122 A Crim R 166 Attorney-General's Reference (No 1 of 1983) [1983] 2 VR 410 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor [1996] HCA 25; (1996) 186 CLR 541 Chamberlain v The Queen [No.2] [1984] HCA 7; (1984) 153 CLR 521 Cox v Salt (1994) 12 WAR 12 Director of Public Prosecutions Reference No.1 of 2017 [2019] HCA 9; (2019) 93 ALJR 424 Doney v R [1990] HCA 51; (1990) 171 CLR 207 May v O'Sullivan [1955] HCA 38; (1955) 92 CLR 654 Peacock v The King [1911] HCA 66; (1911) 13 CLR 619 Plomp v The Queen [1963] HCA 44; (1963) 110 CLR 234 R v Barker (1977) 65 Cr App R 287 R v Hillier [2007] HCA 13; (2007) 228 CLR 618 R v JMR (1991) 57 A Crim R 39 R v Le; R v Loeung [2019] NSWSC 632 R v Prasad (1979) 23 SASR 161; (1979) 2 A Crim R 45 R v R (1989) 18 NSWLR 74; (1989) 44 A Crim R 404 R v Warwick (No.2) [2017] NSWSC 1225 R v Warwick (No.21) [2018] NSWSC 654 R v Warwick (No.48) [2018] NSWSC 1557 R v Warwick (No.49) [2018] NSWSC 1557 R v Warwick (No.55) [2018] NSWSC 2011 R v Warwick (No.62) [2018] NSWSC 2028 The Queen v A2; The Queen v Magennis; The Queen v Vaziri [2019] HCA 35; (2019) 93 ALJR 1106 The Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] HCA 35; (2016) 258 CLR 308 The Queen v Edwards [2009] HCA 20; (2009) 83 ALJR 717 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Crown Leonard John Warwick (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K McKay / G Christofi (Crown) A R Conolly / I Benson (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate