NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Gould (No 1) [2019] NSWDC 688 Hearing dates: 21-25 October 2019 Date of orders: 28 October 2019 Decision date: 28 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Wilson SC DCJ Decision: At [1] Catchwords: EVIDENCE – documents obtained from Cayman Islands – whether obtained by reason of an impropriety – documents produced pursuant to treaty Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 43 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 138 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 166 Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987 (Cth) Cases Cited: DPP v Carr [2002] NSWSC 194 Esso Australia Resources Limited v Plowman (1994) 183 CLR 10 Hua Wang Bank Berhard v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (No 7) (2013) 217 FCR 1 Hua Wang Bank Berhard v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCA 1392 Parker v Comptroller-General of Customs (2009) 83 ALJR 494 Ryan v State of Victoria [2015] VSCA 353 Texts Cited: None Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Vanda Gould (Accused) Representation: Counsel: J Single SC, T Epstein and M Rabsch (Crown) C Smith SC and W de Mars (Accused)
Solicitors: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Webb Henderson (Accused) File Number(s): 2016/00278181 Publication restriction: Publication restricted pending the completion of the trial
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate