NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cohen v Double Bay Bowling Club [2019] NSWSC 1625 Hearing dates: 1 and 18 October 2019 Decision date: 22 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Henry J Decision: See paragraphs [295] and [296] Catchwords: CONTEMPT – criminal contempt – breach of undertaking – construction of undertaking – whether ambiguous – meaning of "works in the nature of excavation" – whether digging of previously excavated material constitutes excavation – whether statement of charges against first defendant properly particularised – insufficient evidence that first defendant "arranged" for works to be carried out in breach of undertaking – whether second defendant carried out works in breach of undertaking as charged – whether contumacy is necessary to find guilty of criminal contempt
CIVIL PROCEDURE – stay of proceedings – abuse of process – whether plaintiffs' bringing of contempt proceedings constitutes abuse of process Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 177 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Part 55, r 13 Cases Cited: ASIC v Sigalla (No 4) (2011) 80 NSWLR 113; [2011] NSWSC 62 Athens v Randwick City Council (2005) 64 NSWLR 58; [2005] NSWCA 317 Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98; (1986) 66 ALR 577 Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Morgan (1965) 112 CLR 483 Bellerive Homes Pty Ltd v FW Projects Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 193 Bodycorp Repairers Pty Ltd v Oakley Thompson & Co Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA 22 Bydand Holdings Pty Limited v Pineland Property Holdings Pty Limited & Ors [2009] NSWSC 579 Bydand Holdings Pty Limited v Pineland Property Holdings Pty Limited & Ors [2009] NSWSC 584 Bydand Holdings Pty Limited v Pineland Property Holdings Pty Limited & Ors [2009] NSWSC 959 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Grocon Constructions (Victoria) Pty Ltd (2014) 47 VR 527; [2014] VSCA 261 Doe v Dowling [2017] NSWSC 202 Dong v Song (No 4) [2019] ACTSC 168 Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125; [2008] HCA 36 Kirkpatrick v Kotis [2004] NSWSC 1265 Markisic v Commonwealth of Australia (2007) 69 NSWLR 737; [2007] NSWCA 92 Matthews v ASIC [2009] NSWCA 155 McDonnell v Novello [2006] NSWSC 1186 McGuirk v University of NSW [2009] NSWSC 1058 Mead v Mead (2007) 235 ALR 197; [2007] HCA 25 Microsoft Corporation v Marks (1996) 69 FCR 117; (1996) 139 ALR 99 Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 3) (2009) 167 LGERA 91; [2009] NSWLEC 92 Pang v Bydand Holdings Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 69 Pisano v Dandris [2015] NSWSC 1219 Rafailidis v Camden Council [2015] NSWCA 185 Re Group Pty Ltd v Kazal (No 4) [2017] FCA 1084 Shaw v Yarranova Pty Ltd (2006) 15 VR 289; [2006] VSCA 291 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573 Spokes v Banbury Board of Health (1865) 1 Eq 42 Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman Networks Ltd (2006) 150 FCR 110; [2006] FCAFC 41 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509; (1992) 107 ALR 635 Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525 Zaia v Eshow [2019] NSWSC 740 Texts Cited: Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford University Press, 5th ed, 2002) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gregory Clive Cohen (First Plaintiff) Mariela Sverdloff (Second Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate