NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Waterfall v R [2019] NSWCCA 281 Hearing dates: 9 October 2019 Date of orders: 25 November 2019 Decision date: 25 November 2019 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Johnson J at [2] Cavanagh J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: Crime — appeals — appeal against sentence — application for leave to appeal — recklessly inflict grievous bodily harm contrary to s 35(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) — whether sentencing judge erred in assessment of objective seriousness of the offence — no principle that the nature of injuries sustained necessarily determines the assessment of objective seriousness — where offender was correctional officer in position of trust and authority over the victim who was an inmate — whether sentence imposed was manifestly excessive — not demonstrated that sentence was unreasonable or plainly unjust Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 33, 35 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s 2A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A(2)(k) Cases Cited: Hili v R; Jones v R (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 McCullough v R [2009] NSWCCA 94; 194 A Crim R 439 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 R v Channells (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), Hunt CJ at CL, Ireland and Dunford JJ, 30 September 1997, unrep) R v Lamella [2014] NSWCCA 122 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343 Stevens v R [2017] NSWCCA 216 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Simon Glen Waterfall (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms C Wasley (Applicant) Ms K Jeffreys (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate