NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Angelis as trustee for the Angelis Family Trust v Pemba Capital Partners Fund I Partnership, LP [2019] NSWSC 1646 Hearing dates: On the papers; submissions received on 23 and 24 November 2019 Decision date: 25 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Declaration that on the proper construction of cl 9 the 2017 Shareholders Agreement between the plaintiffs and the first, second and sixth defendants, a party seeking an exit under cl 9 must intend to achieve an exit that maximises shareholder value but that cl 9 does not require that such exit maximise shareholder value Catchwords: CONTRACTS – construction – interpretation – shareholder agreement – where agreement stated that it was the intention of the parties to achieve an exit that maximises shareholder value – whether an obligation thereby imposed on exiting party to maximise shareholder value Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd; Woodside Energy Ltd v Electricity Generation Corporation (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Rinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd; Rinehart v Rinehart [2019] HCA 13 Category: Principal judgment Parties: James Angelis as trustee for the Angelis Family Trust (First Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant on First Cross-Claim/Sixth Cross-Defendant on Second Cross-Claim) Jitendra Dutt (Second Plaintiff/Third Cross-Defendant on First Cross-Claim) Nathan Brown (Third Plaintiff/Fourth Cross-Defendant on First Cross-Claim) Antony Goldsmith (Fourth Plaintiff/Fifth Cross-Defendant on First Cross-Claim) Copiapo Pty Ltd as trustee for FCK Consulting Trust (Fifth Plaintiff/Sixth Cross-Defendant on First Cross-Claim) Pemba Capital Partners Fund I Partnership, LP (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant on First Cross-Claim/First Cross-Defendant on Second Cross-Claim) Pemba Capital Partners Pty Ltd as trustee for the Castlereagh St (Swan) Co-Investment Trust (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant on First Cross-Claim/Second Cross-Defendant on Second Cross-Claim) Adrian Christopher Kitchin (Third Defendant/Seventh Cross-Defendant on First Cross-Claim/First Cross-Claimant on Second Cross-Claim) Benjamin James Hastie (Fourth Defendant/Eighth Cross-Defendant on First Cross-Claim/Second Cross-Claimant on Second Cross-Claim) Drue Jonathon Giles Castanelli (Fifth Defendant/Ninth Cross-Defendant on First Cross-Claim/Third Cross-Claimant on Second Cross-Claim) Coverforce Holdings Pty Ltd (Sixth Defendant/First Cross-Defendant on First Cross-Claim/Fourth Cross-Defendant on Second Cross-Claim) AUB Group Ltd (Seventh Defendant/Third Cross-Defendant on Second Cross-Claim) Resilium BidCo Pty Ltd (Fourth Cross-Claimant on Second Cross-Claim) Resilium OpCo Pty Ltd (Fifth Cross-Defendant on Second Cross-Claim) Representation: Counsel: F Corsaro SC with H Pintos-Lopez and E Olivier (Plaintiffs) R A Dick SC with E Bathurst (First and Second Defendants) M R Elliott SC with D Ratnam (Third to Fifth Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate