NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Futurepower Developments Pty Ltd v TJ & RF Fordham Pty Ltd t/as TRN Group (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1663 Hearing dates: 1 November 2019 Date of orders: 15 November 2019 Decision date: 15 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Rein J Decision: See [17] and [20]. Catchwords: COSTS – Party/Party – Exceptions to general rule that costs follow the event – Offers of compromise/Calderbank offers – Where the defendant sent the plaintiff a Calderbank letter on 9 August 2017 (approximately two years before the case was finally determined) offering to drop its cross claim (valued at approximately $24,000) in return for the plaintiff agreeing to settle the proceedings and pay the defendant's costs – Held: plaintiff, acting reasonably, should have accepted the defendant's offer.
COSTS – Party/Party – Interest on costs – Where the case began in 2016 and was finally determined in 2019 – Defendant sought, and was granted, an order for interest on costs in the form used in Lahoud v Lahoud and Leda Pty Ltd v Weerden (No 2). Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Baygol Pty Ltd v Foamex Polystyrene Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1089 Futurepower Developments Pty Ltd v TJ & RF Fordham Pty Ltd t/as TRN Group [2019] NSWSC 1554 Giller v Procopets (No 2) [2009] VSCA 72; (2009) 24 VR 1 Lahoud v Lahoud [2006] NSWSC 126 Leda Pty Ltd v Weerden (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 283 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341 MT Associates Pty Ltd v Aqua-Max Pty Ltd (No 3) [2000] VSC 163 Rickard Constructions Pty Ltd v Rickard Hails Moretti Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 481 Secretary to the Department of Business and Innovation v Murdesk Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] VSC 586 Texts Cited: G. E. Dal Pont, Law of Costs (LexisNexis Butterworths, 3rd ed, 2013) Category: Costs Parties: Futurepower Developments Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Mr C. Zarb (Plaintiff's solicitor) TJ & RF Fordham Pty Ltd t/as TRN Group (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr G. Gee (for Mr Zarb) Mr F. Hicks SC with Ms A. Carr (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate