NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Martinez; R v Tortell (No. 5) [2019] NSWSC 1665 Hearing dates: 7 November 2019, 14 November 2019 Date of orders: 21 November 2019 Decision date: 28 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Johnson J Decision: Reasons for ruling made on 21 November 2019 concerning Crown tender of parts of conversation between the Accused persons as evidence of consciousness of guilt Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – murder trial – accused persons alleged to be party to joint criminal enterprise – where Crown seeks to rely on lawfully recorded conversation between accused persons as evidence of consciousness of guilt – whether evidence relevant as consciousness of guilt – whether evidence ought be excluded because of competing inference or alternative explanation for parts of conversation – whether evidence "intractably neutral" and incapable of demonstrating consciousness of guilt – whether evidence ought be excluded because of its prejudicial effect – parts of conversation admissible as evidence of consciousness of guilt Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: BJS v R (2013) 231 A Crim R 537; [2013] NSWCCA 123 IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA Martinez v R; Tortell v R [2019] NSWCCA 153 McKey v R (2012) 219 A Crim R 227; [2012] NSWCCA 1 Meakin v R [2018] NSWCCA 288 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297; [1999] HCA 37 R v Brooks [2017] NSWSC 188 R v Burton (2013) 237 A Crim R 238; [2013] NSWCCA 335 R v Clark (2001) 123 A Crim R 506; [2001] NSWCCA 494 R v Cook [2004] NSWCCA 52 R v Fantakis; R v Woods [2018] NSWSC 1814 R v Sood [2007] NSWCCA 214 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 The Queen v Bauer (2018) 92 ALJR 846; [2018] HCA 40 Vickers v R (2006) 160 A Crim R 195; [2006] NSWCCA 60 Texts Cited: --- Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Wade Martinez and Jake Tortell (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Barr (Crown) Mr C Watson (Accused Martinez) Mr J Trevallion (Accused Tortell)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate