Poulos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 290

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Poulos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 290 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 02 December 2019 Decision date: 02 December 2019 Before: Payne JA; Brereton JA Decision: (1) The notice of motion filed on 18 October 2019 is dismissed; (2) Applicant on the motion to pay the costs of the respondent. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – judgments and orders – amending, varying and setting aside – where no basis for application – where application restates matters addressed in impugned judgment Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 36.15, 36.16, 36.17, 36.18 Cases Cited: Poulos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd [2019] NSWCA 241 Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 4) [2011] NSWCA 324 Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 6) [2012] NSWCA 260 Teoh Hunters Hill Council (No 8) [2014] NSWCA 125 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patricia Poulos (Applicant) Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (Self-represented) F Roughley (Respondent)

Solicitors: Applicant (Self-represented) Gadens (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/00226568 Publication restriction: Nil

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]