NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Angius v Salier (No 4) [2019] NSWSC 1698 Hearing dates: 25 November 2019 Date of orders: 25 November 2019 Decision date: 25 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: See [18] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Appearance — Withdrawal of appearance — Leave of court – further application to withdraw – client unable or unwilling to provide meaningful instructions – whether client fit to attend trial – appointment of tutor pursuant to Court's parens patriae jurisdiction. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.18(1) Cases Cited: Bobolas v Waverley Council [2017] NSWCA 126 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: John Angius (Plaintiff) Gordon Albert Salier (First Defendant) Angius Hotel Investments Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Togumi Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) J&L Angius Pty Ltd (Fourth Defendant) Tararba Pty Ltd (Fifth Defendant) Angius Investments Pty Ltd (Sixth Defendant) Robert Angius (Seventh Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Birtles (First Defendant) H Wrench (Second to Sixth Defendants) V Culkoff (Seventh Defendant)
Solicitors: Gregory Falk & Associates (Plaintiff) Teece Hodgson & Ward (First Defendant) Carneys Lawyers (Second to Sixth Defendants) PV Lawyers (Seventh Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/142494 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate