NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: El Ali v R (No 2) [2019] NSWCCA 289 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 05 December 2019 Decision date: 05 December 2019 Before: Basten JA; Simpson AJA; N Adams J Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to apply, pursuant to r 50C(1A) of the Criminal Appeal Rules, to set aside or vary the judgment given on 30 August 2019. (2) Having reconsidered the material proffered in support of grounds 2 and 5, dismiss the application to set aside or vary the orders. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – procedure – judgment on appeal – application to set aside or vary orders – jurisdiction to reconsider appeal – principle of finality – entry of orders – claim that two grounds not addressed in judgment – leave granted – Criminal Appeal Rules, r 50C
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – charges of (i) conspiracy to import firearm parts, (ii) conspiracy to possess firearm parts and (iii) knowingly taking part in the sale of a pistol to another person on three or more occasions in a 12 month period – whether charge (ii) should have been stayed – whether charge (iii) an aggravated form of charge (ii) – whether charge (ii) a necessary part of charge (i) – whether extended definition of sale should have been left to jury Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 33, 110 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6, 12, 28 Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), ss 4, 51, 51B, 51D Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 68
Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), rr 50C, 51 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.11, 36.16 Cases Cited: Alramadan v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2) [2008] NSWCCA 69 Betts v The Queen (2016) 258 CLR 420; [2016] HCA 25 Burrell v The Queen (2008) 238 CLR 218; [2008] HCA 34 DJL v Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226; [2000] HCA 17 Elliott v The Queen; Blessington v The Queen (2007) 234 CLR 38; [2007] HCA 51 Grierson v The King (1938) 60 CLR 431; [1938] HCA 45 Kauwenberghs v R (Cth) [2009] NSWCCA 201 Nahlous v R (2010) 77 NSWLR 463; [2010] NSWCCA 58 O'Neil-Shaw v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 42 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610; [1998] HCA 57 R v Dodd (1991) 56 A Crim R 451 The Queen v A2 [2019] HCA 35 The Queen v Gee (2003) 212 CLR 230; [2003] HCA 12 R v Grierson (1937) 54 WN (NSW) 144 Texts Cited: Criminal Appeal Rules (Amendment No 1) 2007 (NSW); Govt Gaz No 116, 7 September 2007 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Khoder El Ali (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr N Steel (Appellant) Mr P McGuire SC / Ms A Rose (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate