NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wichman v Pepper Finance Corporation Limited (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 296 Hearing dates: 5 December 2019 Date of orders: 05 December 2019 Decision date: 09 December 2019 Before: Macfarlan JA, Payne JA Decision: (1) Summons seeking leave to appeal dismissed; (2) The applicant to pay the costs of the respondent. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Court of Appeal – application for leave to appeal – no arguable grounds identified – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 121(3) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 13.6 Cases Cited: Collier v Lancer (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 186 K Sheridan v Colin Biggers & Paisley [2019] NSWSC 528 Meads v Meads, 2012 ABQB 571 The Age Co Ltd v Liu [2013] NSWCA 26 Warren Ronald Wichman v Pepper Finance Corporation Limited [2019] NSWCA 195 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Warren Ronald Wichman (Applicant) Pepper Finance Corporation Limited (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self-represented) Dentons Australia (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/245247 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Common Law Division Citation: [2019] NSWSC 1009 Date of Decision: 07 August 2019 Before: Rothman J File Number(s): 2018/227089
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate